Pension advice at the bank – how much will it cost and to whom? The savers’ pension portfolio is normally managed by an insurance agent. When pension counseling is conducted at the Bank, the pension portfolio actually goes to the bank.
Thus, the commissions received currently through the insurance professional from your insurance companies and pension funds are moved to the lender, and his awesome income from the click Here is founded on this.
It had been recently published that the average annual income from the Bank from each pension counseling client is NIS 900, an amount that through the years can accumulate to tens of thousands of shekels, and also the numbers increase as the customer’s pension savings are greater.
Here is a numerical example of the price that lies behind “free bank advice”: A pension fund member having a fixed monthly premium of NIS 2,000 per month (based on a monthly salary of NIS ten thousand) is expected to cover the financial institution from the age of 30 to the age of 67 a commission of approx. NIS 95 thousand.
Pension advice at the bank – what else is very important to know? The Bank can not establish any connection with the employer and manage the pension portfolio for that individual employee, instead of the insurance broker. As a result, there is not any exploitation of economies of scale for your employer as well as the employee, and the employer actually added another “insurance broker” to himself, that is the bank’s pension advisor.
This addition only burdens operational and complicates the collection report. This is why the banks currently operate in a relatively small market share, handling hardly any managers insurance policies or any other insurance policies, and a lot of the consumers are self-employed.
Therefore, customers who are interested in objective , professional and low-cost pension counseling should consult an independent pension counselor who collects a one-off fee for the consultant himself, and will not receive any commissions from your investment houses and the insurance providers.
Since January 2008, there exists a mandatory deposit for many employees, beginning from the end of 3 months of employment or 6 months of employment, according to if the employee includes a pension plan or has reached an employer without any pension savings.
If the employee has pension savings, then the employer will deposit the very first option retroactively, and if the employee is employed towards the end of the season, then by December 31 of the year, whichever is earlier.
This case leaves the employer and employee relatively limited time to do something on the matter. We have often heard of many employees who failed to report for the employer they had a pension plan even after 90 days right from the start in the employment, or knew that they had but did not know who the pension manufacturer was and did not decide on svejpi identity from the pension producer.
Furthermore, employees with complex plans which have not agreed with the insurance professional or perhaps met with him, but have not decided on the mix of their pension portfolio, have already reached three months from your date of employment, however the employer will not know where you should deposit.
In order to address this challenge, default agreements were signed through the employer with one or any other pension manufacturer. Many employers, particularly those with high turnover and turnover, used default agreements in order to transmit lists of workers who had not yet received a decision concerning the identity of the pensionary manufacturer, thereby complying using the provisions from the extension order for compulsory pension.
These agreements, insofar because they were performed with the help of an expert entity, were accompanied by a service specification, to be able the employees receive good quality service, both in the accessibility from the marketers as well as in the professionalism in the pension marketing meetings that happened in each case following the joining.